Cases filed in the US District Court for the Northern District of Ohio
Wynn v. Dodrill We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv02888
Petitioner: Mack Wynn
Respondent: D. Scott Dodrill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nittolo v. Rushing et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv02666
Petitioner: Michael Nittolo
Respondent: Roddie Rushing, U.S. Attorney General N.D. Ohio, General Counsel B.O.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Nittolo v. U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2009cv02071
Plaintiff: Michael Nittolo
Defendant: U.S. Attorney N.D. Ohio, General Counsel F.B.O.P., D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vallejo v. Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 3:2008cv02662
Petitioner: Ramiro R Vallejo
Respondent: Director of Federal Bureau of Prisons, S Beachamp, Sabrina Moore and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
McLendon v. Shartle et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2008cv01495
Petitioner: Juan P McLendon
Respondent: J.T. Shartle, D. Scott Dodrill and Harrell Watts
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Kissi v. Clement et al
as 4:2008cv01373
Petitioner: David M. Kissi
Respondent: Paul D. Clement, Harley Lappin, D. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Watson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2007cv02218
Plaintiff: Charles N. Watson, Jr.
Defendant: Federal Bureau of Prisons, G. Scott Dodrill, Henry J. Sadowski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cosme v. Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2007cv02170
Petitioner: Pablo Cosme
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons, Henry Lappin, S. Scott Dodrill and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?