Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
FISHER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv85258
Defendant: AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff: SCOTT FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLLETT v. FISHER et al
as 3:2019cv01468
Defendant: ROBERT BEARDEN, INC. and SCOTT FISHER
Plaintiff: TOLMAN COLLETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher et al v. Town of Orange Park
as 3:2017cv00393
Plaintiff: Scott Fisher and North Florida Quality Goods and Services, LLC
Defendant: Town of Orange Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Interwrap Corp. v. Schinning et al
as 8:2016cv02647
Plaintiff: Interwrap Corp.
Defendant: Gary Schinning , Scott Fisher and FT Synthetics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREEN v. FISHER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv00512
Petitioner: WILBUR DERRICK GREEN
Respondent: SCOTT FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BEARD v. FISHER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2013cv00032
Petitioner: KELVIN DEWAYNE BEARD
Respondent: SCOTT FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MCANLIS v. FISHER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv00149
Petitioner: THEODORE M MCANLIS
Respondent: SCOTT FISHER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
SCHUSCHNY v. FISHER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2008cv00441
Petitioner: BRUNO SCHUSCHNY
Respondent: SCOTT FISHER
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
GALLOWAY v. FISHER
as 3:2008cv00082
Petitioner: RANDY GALLOWAY
Respondent: SCOTT FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MCCARDLE v. FISHER
as 3:2008cv00037
Petitioner: JAMES MCCARDLE
Respondent: SCOTT FISHER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?