Cases 11 - 20 of 398
Murray v. McAlpin et al
as 6:2024cv00065
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Judge McAlpin, Erik T Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murray v. Lane County et al
as 6:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Johnny C Murray
Defendant:
Lane County, Erik T. Knapp and Scott Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Blekis et al
as 3:2023cv01641
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Blekis, Marcellin, Craig Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Beckert et al
as 3:2023cv01603
Plaintiff:
Dashante Scott Jones
Defendant:
Beckert, Ross, Marcellin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. LeMasters
as 0:2023cv00112
Petitioner:
Jeffery Scott Jones
Respondent:
David LeMasters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jones v. Gateway Chevrolet Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv02323
Plaintiff:
Scott Jones and Scott-Andrew Jones, II
Defendant:
Gateway Chevrolet Incorporated and Robert Revere
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Desert Financial Credit Union
as 2:2023cv02322
Plaintiff:
Scott Jones and Scott-Andrew Jones, II
Defendant:
Desert Financial Credit Union
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Hunter v. Patterson, et al
as 2:2023cv02376
Plaintiff:
David Hunter and David Sampson Hunter
Defendant:
State Media Perpetrators, Rick Alfread Mandeville, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Christopher Jones
as 23-4628
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER SCOTT JONES
Hunter v. Patterson, et al
as 4:2023cv04917
Plaintiff:
David Hunter
Defendant:
State Media Perpetrators, Rick Alfread Mandeville, Scott Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
