Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America et al v. Millennium Health, LLC
as 6:2015cv01367
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Florida and others
Defendant:
Millennium Health, LLC
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
E. Laney v. Richard Getty, et al
as 14-6410
Plaintiff - Appellee:
E. SCOTT LANEY
Defendant:
RICHARD A. GETTY, ALBERT W. BORNE, THE GETTY LAW GROUP, PLLC and others
Defendant - Appellant:
STONER MILL FARM, LLC
E. Laney v. Richard Getty, et al
as 14-6409
Plaintiff - Appellee:
E. SCOTT LANEY
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD A. GETTY and THE GETTY LAW GROUP, PLLC
Defendant:
ALBERT W. BORNE, STONER MILL FARM, LLC and BORNE INVESTIGATIONS, INC.
E. Scott Laney v. Richard Getty, et al
as 14-6224
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
E. SCOTT LANEY
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
RICHARD A. GETTY, ALBERT W. BORNE, STONER MILL FARM, LLC and others
E. Scott Laney v. Richard Getty, et al
as 14-6176
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
E. SCOTT LANEY
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
RICHARD A. GETTY, ALBERT W. BORNE, THE GETTY LAW GROUP, PLLC and others
E. Scott Laney v. Richard Getty, et al
as 14-6175
Plaintiff - Appellee Cross-Appellant:
E. SCOTT LANEY
Defendant:
RICHARD A. GETTY
Defendant - Appellant Cross-Appellee:
STONER MILL FARM, LLC
Laney v. Getty et al
as 5:2012cv00306
Plaintiff:
E. Scott Laney
Defendant:
Richard A. Getty, Albert W. Borne, Stoner Mill Farm, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: Employee Polygraph Protection Act
Randal Laney v. Tommy Felker
as 10-55738
Petitioner - Appellant:
RANDAL SCOTT LANEY
Respondent - Appellee:
TOMMY FELKER, Warden
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2008cv00583
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
