Cases 1 - 10 of 24
HULEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv13059
Plaintiff:
SEAN SCOTT HULEN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Morgan v. Morgan-Parker et al
as 2:2022cv05393
Plaintiff:
Charles Ross Morgan and Charles-Ross Morgan
Defendant:
Ashley Nacole Mayeaux Morgan-Parker, Brian Gerard Mayeaux, Ronnie Shawn Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000 Cause Code Unknown
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv64170
Plaintiff:
SEAN SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv62881
Plaintiff:
SEAN SCOTT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ross v. Sanson
as 6:2021cv06120
Plaintiff:
Sean Scott Ross
Defendant:
Jodi Sanson MD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402
SCOTT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv24872
Plaintiff:
SEAN SCOTT
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Sean Scott
as 21-2007
Defendant / Appellant:
SEAN SCOTT
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Scott v. Domus Construction and Design, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv00623
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and Domus Construction and Design, Inc. a California corporation doing business as Statewide
Plaintiff:
Sean Scott
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
MATTHEWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv25005
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY SEAN SCOTT MATTHEWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ryte et al v. Express Courier International, Inc. et al
as 4:2020cv00238
Plaintiff:
Carmela Hawkins, Terry Cagle, Dimitry Perchik and others
Defendant:
Express Courier International, Inc. and EMP LSO Holding Corporation
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0216 b
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
