Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Jamel Lunsford v. Warden Jacob
as 23-7075
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMEL TYREE LUNSFORD
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN JACOB, WARDEN LOCKLEAR, TODD E. ISHEE, Commissioner of Prison/Director and others
Whitehurst v. Locklear et al
as 5:2023ct03236
Plaintiff:
Angelo Ronnell Whitehurst
Defendant:
Victor Locklear, Bruce Hodges, Sean T. Dillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lunsford v. Jacob et al
as 5:2023ct03176
Plaintiff:
Jamel Tyree Lunsford
Defendant:
Warden Jacob, Warden Locklear, Todd E. Ishee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yates v. Ishee et al
as 5:2023hc02078
Petitioner:
William Yates
Respondent:
Todd E. Ishee, Sean T. Dillard, Teresa O'Brien and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Goodwin et al
as 3:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Adrian Dominic Watkins
Defendant:
K. Goodwin, C. Smith, FNU Glover and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tariq Everette v. Sean Dillard
as 21-7010
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TARIQ EVERETTE, a/k/a Tariq Elijah Everette El
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN T. DILLARD, Warden, TODD E. ISHEE, Director and ERIK A. HOOKS, Secretary of NC Department of Public Safety
Bowers v. Ishee et al
as 5:2021ct03087
Defendant:
Sean T. Dillard and Todd E. Ishee
Plaintiff:
Stanley Maurice Bowers and Stanley Maurice Bowers El
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Everette v. Dillard et al
as 5:2021ct03023
Plaintiff:
Tariq Everette and Tariq Elijah Everette El
Defendant:
Sean T. Dillard, Todd E. Ishee and Erik A. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
May v. Bond et al
as 5:2015ct03058
Plaintiff:
James Anthony May
Defendant:
Monica Bond, George T. Solomon, J. Motley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobbs v. Taylor et al
as 5:2014ct03134
Plaintiff:
Paul C. Hobbs
Defendant:
Felix Taylor, Sean T. Dillard and Officer Meads
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
