Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Aspen Licensing International, Inc. v. Sears Holdings Management Corp. et al
as 9:2018cv80296
Plaintiff:
Aspen Licensing International, Inc.
Defendant:
Sears Holdings Management Corp. and Eastman Footwear Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv09281
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv02070
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv02226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mlinar et al v. Sears Roebuck & Co. et al
as 2:2014cv00243
Plaintiff:
Courtney Mlinar , Jay Mlinar and Jon Mlinar
Defendant:
Sears Roebuck & Co. , Sears Holdings Management Corp. and Whirlpool Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Aaron & Andrew Inc et al v. Sears Holdings Management Corp et al
as 2:2014cv01196
Plaintiff:
Aaron & Andrew Inc and Aaron Design Inc
Defendant:
American International Industries Inc, Does, KMart Corporation and others
Michael Miller Fabrics, LLC v. Dorel Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv06527
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller Fabrics, LLC
Defendant:
Dorel Industries, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc., Hayneedle, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Michael Miller Fabrics, LLC v. Kuhn Rikon Corp.
as 1:2013cv05911
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller Fabrics, LLC
Defendant:
Kuhn Rikon Corp., QVC, Inc., Amazon.com, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Car-Freshner Corporation et al v. Extreme Concepts LLC et al
as 1:2011cv07904
Plaintiff:
Car-Freshner Corporation and Julius Samann Ltd.
Defendant:
Extreme Concepts LLC and Sears Holdings Management Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00340
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
