Cases filed in the Eighth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Carl Davis v. Andrew Simpson, I, et al
as 24-1184
Plaintiff: Carl Davis, doing business as Davis Construction Co.
Defendant: Andrew Dean Simpson, I, Secretary Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture and Tommy James, in his official capacity as Area Director of Monticello, AR area office of USDA Rural Development Agnecy
Carl Davis v. Andrew Simpson
as 22-1961
Plaintiff / Appellee: Carl Davis, doing business as Davis Construction Co.
Defendant / Appellant: Andrew Simpson and Andrew Dean Simpson, I
Defendant / Appellee: Secretary Thomas J. Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture and Tommy James, in his official capacity as Area Director of Monticello, AR area office of USDA Rural Development Agnecy
State of Missouri, et al v. Joseph Biden, Jr., et al
as 21-3013
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of Missouri, State of Arizona, State of Arkansas and others
Defendant / Appellee: Joseph R. Biden, Jr., in his official capacity as the President of the United States of America, Shalanda Young, in her official capacity as the Acting Director of the Office of Management and Budget, Cecilia Rouse, in her official capacity as Chair of the Council of Economic Advisers and others
Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe v. United States Department of Agriculture et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2019cv04094
Defendant: United States Department of Agriculture, Hon. Sonny Perdue and Secretary of Agriculture
Plaintiff: Flandreau Santee Sioux Tribe
Frederick Banks v. Davenport, et al
as 13-2980
Plaintiff - Appellant: Frederick Banks
Defendant - Appellee: Davenport, Tracie Fenner, Malissa Jackson and others
Dale Adams v. USDA, et al
as 12-3696
Plaintiff - Appellant: Dale Brent Adams
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Agriculture and Thomas J. Vilsack, United States Secretary of Agriculture
Kathy Jo Bauck v. Thomas James Vilsack
as 10-1138
Petitioner: Kathy Jo Bauck
Respondent: Thomas James Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture
Sierra Club, et al v. Abigail Kimbell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1639
Plaintiff - Appellant: Sierra Club, Friends of the Boundary Waters Wilderness, Defenders of Wildlife and others
Defendant - Appellee: Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service and Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture
Intervenor Defendant - Appellee: Minnesota Forest Industries, Inc., Minnesota Timber Producers Association, Lake County and others
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee: The Ruffed Grouse Society and Mark Holsten, Commissioner of The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Wildnerness Watch, et al v. Abigail Kimbell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 08-1167
Plaintiff: Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellant: Wilderness Watch, Sierra Club Northstar Chapter and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness
Defendant - Appellee: Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service and Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture
Intervenor - Appellee: Conservationists With Common Sense, Cook County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Minnesota and Arrowhead Coalition for Multiple Use
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Grand Portage Band of the Minnesota Tribe
Wilderness Watch, et al v. Abigail Kimbell, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 07-3689
Plaintiff: Izaak Walton League of America, Inc.
Plaintiff - Appellant: Wilderness Watch, Sierra Club Northstar Chapter and Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness
Defendant - Appellee: Abigail Kimbell, Chief of the United States Forest Service and Mike Johanns, Secretary of Agriculture
Intervenor - Appellee: Conservationists With Common Sense, Cook County, a Political Subdivision of the State of Minnesota and Arrowhead Coalition for Multiple Use
Amicus On Behalf Of Appellee: Minnesota Department of Natural Resources and Grand Portage Band of the Minnesota Tribe

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?