Cases 1 - 10 of 156
State of Alaska Department of Fish and Game v. Federal Subsistence Board, et al.
as 24-179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL SUBSISTENCE BOARD, DAVID SCHMID, in his official capacity as the Regional Supervisor for the United States Forest Service, SONNY PERDUE, in his official capacity as the United States Secretary of Agriculture and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
ORGANIZED VILLAGE OF KAKE
Hanzlick v. Vilsack
as 23-3632
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LYLE M. HANZLICK
Defendant / Appellee:
TOM VILSACK, Office of the Secretary of Agriculture
Corey Lea v. Thomas Vilsack
as 23-3835
Petitioner:
COREY LEA
Respondent:
SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE THOMAS J. VILSACK
Los Padres Forestwatch, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-55801
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOS PADRES FORESTWATCH, KEEP SESPE WILD COMMITTEE, EARTH ISLAND INSTITUTE and others
Plaintiff:
CITY OF OJAI and COUNTY OF VENTURA
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, KARINA MEDINA, District Ranger, United States Forest Service, TOM VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, United States Department of Agriculture and others
James McConnell v. AGRI, et al
as 23-5844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES D. MCCONNELL
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS J. VILSACK, in his official capacity as the Secretary of Agriculture and KEVIN SHEA, in his official capacity as Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
Oregon Wild, et al v. USFS, et al
as 23-35579
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OREGON WILD, an Oregon nonprofit corporation and WILDEARTH GUARDIANS, a New Mexico nonprofit corporation
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, MICHAEL RAMSEY, in his official capacity as Lakeview Ranger District Ranger, JEANNETTE WILSON, in her official capacity as Silver Lake Ranger District Ranger and others
Dalton, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4107
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Plaintiff:
GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner:
GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Garfield County, Utah, et al v. Biden, et al
as 23-4106
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARFIELD COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, KANE COUNTY, UTAH, a Utah political subdivision, THE STATE OF UTAH and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
ZEBEDIAH GEORGE DALTON, BLUERIBBON COALITION, KYLE KIMMERLE and others
Defendant / Appellee:
JOSEPH R. BIDEN, JR., in his official capacity as President of the United States, DEB HAALAND, in her official capacity as Secretary of Interior, THE DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR and others
Intervenor Defendant / Appellee:
HOPI TRIBE, NAVAJO NATION, PUEBLO OF ZUNI and others
Petitioner:
GRAND STAIRCASE ESCALANTE PARTNERS, SOCIETY OF VERTEBRATE PALEONTOLOGY, CONSERVATION LANDS FOUNDATION, INC. and others
Lea v. Secretary of Agriculture, Thomas Vilsack et al
as 3:2023cv00340
Plaintiff:
Corey Lea
Defendant:
Secretary of Agriculture, Thomas Vilsack and United States Department of Agriculture, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Corey Lea, et al v. U.S. Department of Agriculture, et al
as 23-5169
Plaintiff / Appellant:
COREY LEA, SFE LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY, INC., WILLIE CHARLES KENNEDY and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DOE, JANE DOE and DOROTHY WISE
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, THOMAS J. VILSACK, Secretary of Agriculture, ZACH DUCHENEAUX, FSA Administrator and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
