Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Rogers v. Snyder et al
as 3:2024cv00028
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rogers
Defendant:
Brad Snyder, Sheila Robertson, Jacob White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Payne
as 4:2023cv01101
Plaintiff:
Seth Bradley Smith
Defendant:
Dexter Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Criswell v. Wakefield et al
as 4:2022cv01142
Plaintiff:
Paul Criswell
Defendant:
Seth Wakefield and Does "Mayor", City of Bryant; "Chief of Police", Bryant Police Department; "Direct Supervisor" to Seth Wakefield and 1-6 "Unknown Patrol Officers", Bryant Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Felker v. National Cart Co. et al
as 5:2022mc00067
Plaintiff:
Seth Felker
Defendant:
National Cart Co., National Cart, LLC, National Cart Co. East, LLC and others
Washington v. Pipelife Jet Stream, Inc.
as 5:2022cv05165
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Washington, Miles Matthews, Jimmy Beck and others
Defendant:
Pipelife Jet Stream, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Marshall v. McCain et al
as 2:2022cv00135
Plaintiff:
Calvin L Marshall
Defendant:
Kelly McCain, Tracy Bennett, Valerie Westbrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vancamp v. Smedley
as 6:2022cv06058
Plaintiff:
Joseph Drew Vancamp
Defendant:
Officer Seth Smedley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Phillips et al
as 4:2022cv00226
Plaintiff:
Byron A Williams
Defendant:
Jeff Phillips, Seth Bradley and Heather Patton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcum v. Stevens et al
as 2:2021cv02086
Defendant:
Attorney Sam Eastman, Len Bradley, Sara Capp and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Marcum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marcum v. Stevens et al
as 4:2021cv00338
Defendant:
Ostendorf, Len Bradley, Sara Capp and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald A Marcum
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
