Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Demaree et al v. Castro et al
as 1:2022cv08772
Plaintiff:
Matthew Demaree, Alex Yohn, Berenger Lieber and others
Defendant:
Thomas Castro, Cyril Polizzi, Quentin Detraux and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Palmer Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. Seung Lee et al
as 2:2022cv04388
Plaintiff:
Palmer Sixth Street Properties, L.P.
Defendant:
Alex Kim, Seung Lee and Does 1 to 10, inclusive
Palmer Sixth Street Properties, L.P. v. Seung Lee et al
as 2:2022cv03824
Plaintiff:
Palmer Sixth Street Properties, L.P.
Defendant:
Seung Lee, Hyun Yang and Does 1 to 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Phillips v. Churchill Capital Corporation IV et al
as 4:2021cv09323
Plaintiff:
Randy Phillips, Max Royal LLC, Seung Lee and others
Defendant:
Churchill Capital Corporation IV, Atieva Inc d/b/a Lucid Motors, Michael Klein and others
Petitioner:
Dr. Michael A. Howell
Wren LA JV, LLC v. Seung Lee et al
as 2:2021cv07720
Plaintiff:
Wren LA JV, LLC
Defendant:
Seung Lee and Does 1 to 10 inclusive
WREN LA JV, LLC v. Seung Lee et al
as 2:2021cv07287
Plaintiff:
WREN LA JV, LLC
Defendant:
Seung Lee, Does 1 to 10 inclusive and Aileen Han
WREN LA JV, LLC v. Seung Lee et al
as 2:2021cv04314
Plaintiff:
WREN LA JV, LLC
Defendant:
Does 1 to 10 inclusive and Seung Lee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Phillips v. Churchill Capital Corporation IV et al
as 1:2021cv00539
Defendant:
Michael Klein, Churchill Capital Corporation IV, Peter Rawlinson and others
Plaintiff:
Randy Phillips, Max Royal LLC, Seung Lee and others
JTH Tax LLC v. Lee et al
as 3:2021cv00013
Defendant:
Seung Lee and The Lee Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
JTH Tax LLC d/b/a Liberty Tax Service
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
