Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 312
Powers v. Lodge et al
as 4:2024cv04058
Plaintiff: Thomas Powers
Defendant: Paula Lodge, Shan Jumper, . Queen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crabb v. Donathan et al
as 4:2024cv04051
Plaintiff: Steven C Crabb
Defendant: Greg Donathan, John Doe, David Suire and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Penton v. Lodge et al
as 4:2024cv04040
Plaintiff: Jordan Penton
Defendant: Paula Lodge, Vipin Shah, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Anthony Sullivan v. Gerald Carreon, et al
as 24-1246
Plaintiff: ANTHONY SULLIVAN
Defendant: GERALD CARREON, ELANOR SCHUPICK, CORA BEZOLD and others
Penton v. Haq et al
as 4:2023cv04212
Plaintiff: Jordan Penton
Defendant: Yasir Haq, . Tinwalla, Paula Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Mackel v. Shan Jumper, et al
as 23-2866
Plaintiff / Appellant: DAVID L. MACKEL
Defendant / Appellee: SHAN JUMPER, PAULA LODGE, HEATHER HYMES and others
Speagle v. Donathan et al
as 4:2023cv04148
Plaintiff: Billy A Speagle
Defendant: Greg Donathan, Liberty Healthcare Corporation, Shan Jumper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walls v. Jumper et al
as 4:2023cv04102
Petitioner: William CE Walls
Respondent: Shan Jumper and State of Illinois
Not Classified By Court: Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sullivan v. Jumper et al
as 4:2023cv04059
Plaintiff: Anthony Sullivan
Defendant: Shan Jumper, Gerald Carreon, Sandra Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Hymes et al
as 4:2023cv04051
Plaintiff: Chadd Morris
Defendant: Heather Hymes, . Calon, Paula Lodge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?