Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Kelly v. Rosales, et al.
as 24-827
Plaintiff:
SHANNON KELLY
Defendant:
M. ROSALES, Correctional Lieutenant, official capacity, J. CODY, Correctional Sergeant, official capacity and J. MARTINEZ, Correctional Officer, official capacity
Tshombe M. Kelley v. A. Martinez et al
as 2:2023cv08879
Plaintiff:
Tshombe M. Kelley
Defendant:
A. Martinez, I.S.U Officer A. Cox and A. Woodford
Petitioner:
Shannon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shannon Kelly v. M. Rosales et al
as 2:2023cv05940
Plaintiff:
Shannon Kelly
Defendant:
M. Rosales, J. Cody and Correctional Officer J. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shannon Coffer v. Andrew Watson et al
as 2:2020cv05995
Defendant:
Andrew Watson and The U.S Department of Veterans Affairs
Plaintiff:
Shannon Coffer and Shannon Kelly Coffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv01734
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Burton v. Kubista et al
as 5:2018cv00915
Defendant:
Shannon Kelly, Dr Nickolous Kubista, Brandon Hollingsworth and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Burton v. Kubista et al
as 3:2018cv02096
Defendant:
Shannon Kelly, Dr Nickolous Kubista, Brandon Hollingsworth and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Scott Burton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KELLY v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2018cv08569
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA, INC. ("IMERYS TALC")
Plaintiff:
SHANNON KELLY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01797
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv05913
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
