Cases 1 - 10 of 26
IN RE: FORTRA FILE TRANSFER SOFTWARE DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
as 1:2024md03090
Not Yet Classified:
FORTRA FILE TRANSFER SOFTWARE DATA SECURITY BREACH LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Beverly Banks, Sadie Brooks, Tracy Bussell and others
Defendant:
NationsBenefits Holdings, LLC, NationsBenefits, LLC, Santa Clara Family Health Plan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1407 Multidistrict Litigation
McCoy v. The Kroger Co
as 3:2023cv02383
Plaintiff:
Sharon McCoy
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and The Kroger Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Clervrain et al v. Lankford et al
as 5:2022cv00283
Plaintiff:
Biglauwick Plaisimond, Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir and others
Defendant:
James Lankford, Jim Inhofe, Stephanie Bice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chance v. Roberts, et al
as 22-7008
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONNIE MAC CHANCE
Defendant / Appellee:
JARRED ROBERTS, STARLA PHILLIPS, SHARON MCCOY and others
Sheets v. McCoy
as 4:2021cv00539
Petitioner:
Robert Ray Sheets
Respondent:
Sharon McCoy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Chance v. Roberts et al
as 6:2020cv00373
Defendant:
Jarred Roberts, Starla Phillips, Sharon McCoy and others
Plaintiff:
Ronnie M. Chance
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. McCoy
as 5:2020cv00986
Respondent:
Sharon McCoy
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Smart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smart v. McCoy
as 6:2020cv00331
Respondent:
Sharon McCoy
Petitioner:
Jimmy Lee Smart
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
L.G. v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2020cv00306
Defendant:
Rabekah Mooneyham, Board of Corrections, Penny Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
L. G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
G v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2020cv00893
Defendant:
Rabekah Mooneyham, Board of Corrections, Penny Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
L G
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
