Cases 1 - 10 of 62
McCoy v. Booker et al
as 4:2023cv04127
Plaintiff:
Atarah McCoy
Defendant:
Shaulis Booker, Telamon Corporation and Booker Shaulis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
BASKIN v. CLEMMONS
as 3:2021cv00701
Defendant:
W CLEMMONS, ALFORD, B PINEDAS and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L BASKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BASKIN v. LEAVINS
as 3:2021cv00699
Defendant:
AARON LEAVINS, B PINEDAS, M BANTIQUE and others
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L BASKIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BASKIN v. SHAULIS et al
as 3:2021cv00705
Plaintiff:
EDWARD L BASKIN
Defendant:
C SHAULIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes v. Shauli Enterprises Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv02804
Plaintiff:
Onasis Reyes
Defendant:
Shauli Enterprises Inc. doing business as Chop Chop, Andrew Rutta, Shauli Enterprises Two Inc. doing business as Chop Chop and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
SHAULIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv06654
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MYKLE SHAULIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pepaj et al v. Kimmico, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv02971
Defendant:
Kimmico, Inc. doing business as Fantasies Nightclub and Sports Bar also known as Fantasies Nightclub, Fantasies Nightclub and Frank R. Shaulis
Plaintiff:
Ina Schnitzer, Ursula Mayes, Brooke Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Ramirez et al v. 60th St. Fleish Gesheft Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04308
Plaintiff:
Armando Ramirez and Eustasio Gonzalez
Defendant:
60th St. Fleish Gesheft Inc. doing business as Shauly's Meal Mart, Joel Goldberger and Joseph Goldberger
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
USA v. Kelly Shaulis
as 20-2253
Defendant / Appellant:
KELLY B. SHAULIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
