Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00384
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Clervrain v. McConchie et al
as 1:2021cv01379
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain also known as Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu doing business as Brandako, Inc, Francis Cobbina Osei-Fosu, Manetirony Clervrain and others
Defendant:
Dan McConchie, Jim Durkin, Ronna McDaniel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Couri v. Pavia
as 19-2442
Defendant / Appellee:
Paul Wooten, JSC/Kings, Riverside County District Attorney Office, John Does, 1-15 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Couri
Couri v. Pavia
as 19-2260
Defendant / Appellee:
UW Hospital, Paul Wooten, JSC/Kings, Riverside County District Attorney Office and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Couri
Couri v. Pavia et al
as 1:2019cv05436
Defendant:
ADA Garrett Behrens, Sulmeyer Kupetz, Dan Angers and others
Plaintiff:
James Couri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Abulzahab et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12658
Plaintiff:
Alie Soufan, Roy Gendron, Derek Thomas and others
Defendant:
Rasier, LLC, Nelson Chai, Dara Khosrowshahi and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206
Winchester v. Illinois Republican Party et al
as 3:2018cv01137
Plaintiff:
Robert Winchester
Defendant:
Illinois Republican Party , Shaun Murphy, Judy Diekelman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. United States of America
as 2:2016cv02456
Movant:
Shaun Murphy
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kailey v. Ritter et al
as 1:2011cv00144
Plaintiff:
Randy Kailey
Defendant:
Bill (I) Ritter, Jr, Bill Ritter, Jr., Bill (I) Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. Pfizer Inc
as 3:2010cv01380
Plaintiff:
Shaun Murphy
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
