Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Shaw v. Dailey
as 1:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Delvin L. Shaw
Defendant:
Sgt. John Dailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shaw v. N.D.S.P.
as 1:2022cv00047
Petitioner:
Delvin Lamont Shaw
Respondent:
N.D.S.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Shaw v. USA
as 1:2022cv00028
Petitioner:
Kinzey Shaw
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gourneau et al v. United States Department of the Interior et al
as 1:2021cv00031
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Spotted Bear, Jordan Gunderson, Dennis G. Nash and others
Defendant:
United States Department of the Interior, Assistant Secretary-Indian Affairs, Tesoro High Plains Pipeline Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Benter v. Schmitz et al
as 3:2020cv00181
Defendant:
Dan Heidbreder, Troy Kelly, State of North Dakota and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Benter v. Schmitz et al
as 3:2020cv00081
Defendant:
Dan Heidbreder, Troy Kelly, State of North Dakota and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Benter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cypress Development, LLC et al v. Shaw-Lundquist Associates, Inc.
as 1:2019cv00253
Plaintiff:
Diversified Development, LLC, Barclay Armitage, Cypress Development, LLC and others
Defendant:
Shaw-Lundquist Associates, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Shaw v. Grand Forks Police Department et al
as 3:2016cv00108
Plaintiff:
Delvin Lamont Shaw
Defendant:
Grand Forks Police Department, Steve Conley and Mike Jennings
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Grand Forks Police Department et al
as 4:2015cv00181
Plaintiff:
Delvin Lamont Shaw
Defendant:
Grand Forks Police Department, Steve Conley and Mike Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Shaw v. Shell
as 2:2015cv00102
Plaintiff:
Delvin Lamont Shaw
Defendant:
Shannon Shell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
