Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Holmes v. Chen et al
as 4:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Kiara Holmes
Defendant:
Steve Chen, Chad Hurley, Jawed Karim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
(PS) Holmes v. Chen et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Kiara Holmes
Defendant:
Steve Chen, Chad Hurley, Jawed Karim and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LALONE v. Dorsey et al
as 3:2023cv00772
Plaintiff:
KEVIN LALONE
Defendant:
Jack Dorsey, Roelof Botha, Amy Brooks and others
Dulay #303660 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv02201
Plaintiff:
Dilpreet Singh Dulay
Defendant:
David Shinn, Brianna Betencourt, Angelhica Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Julian Ahab Nafal v. Shawn Carter et al
as 2:2022cv04389
Plaintiff:
Julian Ahab Joseph Nafal
Defendant:
Shawn Carter, Timothy Mosely, Kyambo Joshua and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Bushansky v. Square, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv08013
Plaintiff:
Stephen Bushansky
Defendant:
Square, Inc., Randy Garutti, Mary Meeker and others
Shawn Carter v. Jonathan Mannion et al
as 2:2021cv04848
Plaintiff:
Shawn Carter and Jay-Z
Defendant:
Jonathan Mannion Photography LLC and Jonathan Mannion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lenora Antoinette Stines v. BJC Touring, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv05364
Defendant:
BJC Touring, Inc., Shawn Carter, Beyonce Knowles-Carter and others
Plaintiff:
Lenora Stines and Lenora Antoinette Stines
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Osama Fahmy v. Jay-Z, et al
as 16-55213
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSAMA AHMED FAHMY
Defendant - Appellee:
JAY-Z, AKA Shawn Carter, TIMOTHY MOSELY, FKA Timbaland, KYAMBO JOSHUA and others
Osama Fahmy v. Jay-Z, et al
as 16-55213
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OSAMA AHMED FAHMY
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY-Z, AKA Shawn Carter, TIMOTHY MOSELY, FKA Timbaland, KYAMBO JOSHUA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
