Cases 41 - 50 of 60
Hughes v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2014cv02502
Plaintiff:
Steven Alan Hughes
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Janssen, Shelby County Division of Corrections & Correct Care Solutions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Slater v. Black et al
as 2:2014cv02498
Plaintiff:
VeJay Slater
Defendant:
K. Black and Shelby County Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKinney v. The Shelby County Government et al
as 2:2014cv02424
Plaintiff:
Andre' Mario McKinney
Defendant:
The Shelby County Government and Shelby County Division of Correction-Shelby County Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sumlin v. Doss et al
as 2:2014cv02344
Plaintiff:
Leon Sumlin
Defendant:
Barry Doss and Shelby County Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stokes v. Love et al
as 2:2014cv02307
Plaintiff:
Lullowen Terrell Stokes
Defendant:
CeCelia Love and Shelby County Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cage v. Shelby County Divisions of Corrections
as 2:2014cv02290
Plaintiff:
Boderick Gerard Cage
Defendant:
Shelby County Divisions of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Beach et al
as 2:2013cv02366
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lashon Jones
Defendant:
Micheal Beach, Charles Harts and Shelby County Division of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Holcomb v. Coleman et al
as 2:2012cv02620
Plaintiff:
Luegene Holcomb
Defendant:
James E. Coleman, Shelby County Division of Corrections, Shelby County Division of Corrections Grievance Dept. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carter v. Dixon et al
as 2:2012cv02450
Plaintiff:
Gary Carter
Defendant:
Dixon, Adam, Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonner v. Swanson et al
as 2:2012cv02291
Plaintiff:
Guyoka D. Bonner
Defendant:
Debra Swanson and Shelby County Division of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
