Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Smith v. Downey et al
as 3:2021cv00454
Defendant:
Sherman Smith, Charles Olsen, Ariell Hartwell and others
Plaintiff:
Jana Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
SMITH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52031
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN SMITH
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
as 2:2020cv00878
Defendant:
Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Sherman Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Davis
as 6:2018cv00196
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Petitioner:
Antoine Sherman Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Miller et al v. The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey et al
as 1:2017cv07136
Plaintiff:
Maurice Miller , Tanysha Newman , Sharon Orphal and Alan Orphal and others
Defendant:
The Port Authority of New York and New Jersey , The 3M Company and Tyco Fire Products, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sherman Smith v. United Consumer Financial Services Company et al
as 5:2016cv02142
Defendant:
Does and United Consumer Financial Services Company
Plaintiff:
Sherman Smith
Martinez et al v. MXI Corp et al
as 3:2015cv00243
Defendant:
Andrew Brooks, Jeanette L Brooks, Martin J Brooks and others
Plaintiff:
Enrique Martinez, Michelle Martinez and Sunshine Martinez-Valdez
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
McElroy v. Smith et al
as 4:2012cv00760
Plaintiff:
David Andrew McElroy
Defendant:
Sherman Smith, Randy Morgan and Shawn Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2012cv00755
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02813
Plaintiff:
Sherman Smith and Deanna Smith
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
