Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Matsumoto v. Butterfield Gourmet, LLC
as 3:2024cv00017
Plaintiff:
Shoichi Matsumoto
Defendant:
Butterfield Gourmet LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
MATSUMOTO v. PHO REAL LLC
as 1:2023cv02059
Plaintiff:
SHOICHI MATSUMOTO
Defendant:
PHO REAL LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Matsumoto v. JIN28 CS Inc.
as 1:2023cv01676
Plaintiff:
Shoichi Matsumoto
Defendant:
JIN28 CS Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Matsumoto v. Houston Chronicle Publishing Company et al
as 4:2022cv04014
Plaintiff:
Shoichi Matsumoto
Defendant:
Houston Chronicle Publishing Company and Hearst Communications, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Matsumoto v. Mahanakorn Inc.
as 3:2022cv01781
Plaintiff:
Shoichi Matsumoto
Defendant:
Mahanakorn Inc. doing business as Pure Thai & Vegetarian Cuisine
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Matsumoto v. DVO Enterprises
as 2:2022cv00443
Plaintiff:
Shoichi Matsumoto
Defendant:
DVO Enterprises
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0501 Copyright Infringement
Matsumoto v. Watson
as 1:2021cv11827
Plaintiff:
Shoichi Matsumoto
Defendant:
Maria Lugo Watson
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Matsumoto v. Fresh Healthy Media, LLC
as 5:2021cv08261
Plaintiff:
Shoichi Matsumoto and Marc Matsumoto
Defendant:
Fresh Healthy Media, LLC Fresh Healthy Media, LLC dba VegNews Magazine doing business as VegNews Magazine and Fresh Healthy Media, LLC doing business as VegNews Magazine
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Matsumoto v. K-VA-T Food Stores, Inc.
as 1:2021cv00038
Plaintiff:
Shoichi Matsumoto
Defendant:
K-VA-T Food Stores, Inc. doing business as Food City
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
MATSUMOTO v. EPICURUS MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
as 3:2019cv19158
Defendant:
EPICURUS MANAGEMENT GROUP, INC.
Plaintiff:
SHOICHI MATSUMOTO
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
