Cases 1 - 3 of 3
FTC v. Carey Howe, et al
as 20-55091
Defendant:
MJ WEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC, Relief Defendant, ARETE FINANCIAL GROUP LLC, ARETE FINANCIAL GROUP, a corporation, DBA Arete Financial Freedom and others
Defendant / Appellant:
OLIVER POMAZI, individually and as an officer or director of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; and J&L Enterprise LLC, CAREY G. HOWE, individually and as an officer or manager of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; CBC Conglomerate LLC; and La Casa Bonita Investments, Inc., SHUNMIN MIKE HSU, individually and as an officer or manager of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; CBC Conglomerate LLC; and La Casa Bonita Investment, Inc. and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
FTC v. Carey Howe, et al
as 20-55092
Defendant:
MJ WEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC, Relief Defendant, ARETE FINANCIAL GROUP LLC, ARETE FINANCIAL GROUP, a corporation, DBA Arete Financial Freedom and others
Defendant / Appellant:
OLIVER POMAZI, individually and as an officer or director of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; and J&L Enterprise LLC, CAREY G. HOWE, individually and as an officer or manager of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; CBC Conglomerate LLC; and La Casa Bonita Investments, Inc., SHUNMIN MIKE HSU, individually and as an officer or manager of Arete Financial Group; Arete Financial Group LLC; CBC Conglomerate LLC; and La Casa Bonita Investment, Inc. and others
Receiver:
THOMAS W. MCNAMARA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Federal Trade Commission v. American Financial Support Services Inc. et al
as 8:2019cv02109
Defendant:
Ruddy Palacios, Carey G. Howe, Jay Singh and others
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Receiver:
Thomas W. McNamara
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Robert Mockler
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
