Cases 1 - 10 of 20
Croskey v. Montgomery County Department of Human Resources et al (MAG+)
as 2:2025cv00155
Defendant:
CaraStar, Montgomery County Department of Human Resources, Montgomery Public Schools and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Chloe Croskey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Reynolds et al (MAG+)
as 2:2020cv00965
Defendant:
Sibley G. Reynolds, Nehemiah Scroggins, Gerald Jerry Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Virgil R. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. Reynolds et al
as 2:2020cv00972
Defendant:
J Knoxx Argo, Nehemiah Scroggins, Stone & Britts and others
Plaintiff:
Virgil Ruth Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Timothy Tarver v. Sibley Reynolds
as 19-13538
Plaintiff / Appellant:
TIMOTHY W. TARVER
Defendant / Appellee:
SIBLEY G. REYNOLDS
Tarver v. Reynolds
as 2:2018cv01034
Plaintiff:
Timothy W. Tarver
Defendant:
Sibley G. Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett v. Henline et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00996
Defendant:
Capt. Jackson, Warden Estes, Sibley G. Reynolds and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro G. Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harrison v. Franklin et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2018cv00942
Defendant:
Janet Davidson, Sibley G. Reynolds, Randall Houston and others
Plaintiff:
Dwone Carnell Harrison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Frazier v. Sibley Reynolds, et al
as 15-13537
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CALVIN FRAZIER
Defendant - Appellee:
SIBLEY G. REYNOLDS, Circuit Court Judge, Individual, RANDALL V. HOUSTON, District Attorney and BRANDON W. BATES, Assistant District Attorney
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-12489
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Frazier v. Reynolds et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00381
Plaintiff:
James Calvin Frazier
Defendant:
Sibley G. Reynolds, Court of Criminal Appeals, Alabama Supreme Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
