Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ronald Bibb v. Malek and Malek, et al
as 23-3982
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD DWAYNE BIBB
Defendant / Appellee:
MALEK AND MALEK, Attorneys at Law, SINCLAIR BROADCAST GROUP, INC., NBC NEWS, and affiliates and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02477
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv02406
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 Americans with Disabilities Act - Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bibb v. Malek and Malek Attys at Law et al
as 2:2020cv06541
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwayne Bibb
Defendant:
Mastercard Headquarter Corp., Ohio Health Grant Medical Center, NBC News and Affiliates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bibb v. Malek and Malek et al
as 2:2020cv06491
Defendant:
NBC News, Malek and Malek, Viacom CBS and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwayne Bibb
Bibb v. Malek and Malek Attys at Law et al
as 1:2020cv09594
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwayne Bibb
Defendant:
Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc., Ohio Health Grant Medical Center, NBC News and Affiliates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bibb v. Malek and Malek et al
as 1:2020cv08738
Defendant:
NBC News, Malek and Malek, Viacom CBS and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Dwayne Bibb
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
Engel v Gray Television & Subsidiaries, et al
as 6:2017cv03190
Plaintiff:
Noel John Paul Engel
Defendant:
Gray Television & Subsidiaries, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc., FOX Network & Subsidiaries and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00537
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
