Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Boehringer et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2018cv00920
Plaintiff: Robert D. Boehringer and Deborah Jo Boehringer
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc. , John Keggi and Orthopaedics New England, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Deleo v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 3:2018cv00709
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: John R. Deleo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00709
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: John R. Deleo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Koda v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2018cv00222
Plaintiff: Gene Koda
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Flores v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 1:2017cv09848
Plaintiff: Berta E. Flores
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Williams v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01998
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Allen Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fisher v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05293
Plaintiff: Alan Fisher
In Re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Bannayte v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2017cv05292
Plaintiff: Clifford Bannayte
In Re: Smith & Nephew Birmingham Hip Resurfacing (BHR) Hip Implant Products Liability Litigation
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Proudfoot v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 3:2017cv01106
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff: Francis Gregg Proudfoot, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmquist v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2017cv03960
Plaintiff: Marc Palmquist
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?