Other Statutes Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 89
Cleveland v. Smith & Nephew Inc
as ALN/4:17-00243-00000
Plaintiff: Roy D Cleveland, Jr
Defendant: Smith & Nephew Inc
Morgan v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as MOW/5:17-cv-06015
Plaintiff: Suzanne Morgan
Defendant: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
IN RE ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANT DEVICE ANTITRUST LITIGATION Featured Case
as 1:2007ml09831
Plaintiff: PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, PAUL J. CHAIKEN, DDS, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Defendant: BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC, BIOMET, INC and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Anti-trust
IN RE SYNTHES (U.S.A.) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-M910
Respondent: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Petitioner: Synthes (U.S.A.)
O'Donnell et al v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2018md00003
Plaintiff: Thomas O'Donnell, Deborah Iannamorelli
Defendant: Smith & Nephew , Inc.
SMITH & NEPHEW V ARTHREX We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 10-1427
Defendant-Appellant: Arthrex, Inc., Arthrex, Inc., Arthrex, Inc. and others
Plaintiff-Appellee: Smith & Nephew, Inc., Smith & Nephew, Inc., Smith & Nephew, Inc. and others
LEXION MEDICAL V NORTHGATE TECH We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-1494
Plaintiff-Appellee: Lexion Medical, LLC
Defendant-Appellant: Linvatec Corporation, Northgate Technologies, Inc., Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Chillds v. Smith & Nephew , Inc.
as 1:2017md00003
Plaintiff: Diane Chillds
Defendant: Smith & Nephew , Inc.
Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Nash
as 1:2007mc00099
Plaintiff: Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Defendant: Todd Nash
SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC v. ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC. et al
as 1:2007cv07001
Plaintiff: SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC, SOUTH CENTRAL SURGICAL CENTER, LLC and others
Defendant: ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER HOLDINGS, INC, ZIMMER, INC and others
Cause Of Action: Fed. Question: Anti-trust

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?