Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Andrews et al v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00103
Defendant:
JB Orthopedic Appliances, LLC, Smith & Nephew, Inc., Pure Play Orthopaedics Sales, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Faye Andrews and William Wayne Andrews
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kemp v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv00593
Defendant:
Chad Cross, Baptist Hospitals of Southeast Texas, Smith& Nephew Consolidated, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jesse Kemp and Jesse Eugene Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew Inc et al
as 2:2016cv01041
Plaintiff:
Arthrex, Inc.
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew Inc and ArthroCare, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01756
Plaintiff:
Arthrex, Inc.
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc. and ArthroCare, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01047
Plaintiff:
Arthrex, Inc.
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc. and ArthroCare, Corp.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arthrex, Inc. v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2014cv00213
Plaintiff:
Arthrex, Inc.
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Smith & Nephew Inc v. Exact Surgical, Inc.
as 4:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
Smith & Nephew Inc
Defendant:
Exact Surgical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GHJ HOLDINGS, LLC v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 5:2011cv00043
Plaintiff:
GHJ HOLDINGS, LLC
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MedIdea, LLC v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 2:2009cv00378
Plaintiff:
MedIdea, LLC, MedIdea, LLC and MedIdea, LLC
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Carr v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
as 6:2009cv00383
Defendant:
Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Robert Carr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
