Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Oropeza v. Smith-Whitson et al
as 2:2014cv02115
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
A Smith-Whitson, Linda Vega, Tresa Schroeder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oropeza v. Smith-Whitson et al
as 2:2014cv02118
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
A Smith-Whitson, Janice K Brewer, Tom Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oropeza v. Smith-Whitson et al
as 2:2014cv02111
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
A Smith-Whitson, Tom Horne, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oropeza v. Smith-Whitson et al
as 2:2014cv02119
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
A Smith-Whitson, Janice K Brewer, Tom Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oropeza v. Smith-Whitson et al
as 2:2014cv02117
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
A Smith-Whitson, Janice K Brewer, Tom Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oropeza v. Smith-Whitson et al
as 2:2014cv02116
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
A Smith-Whitson, Janice K Brewer, Tom Horne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oropeza v. Smith-Whitson et al
as 2:2014cv02114
Plaintiff:
Frederico Oropeza
Defendant:
A Smith-Whitson, Tresa Schroeder, Linda Vega and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maisano v. LaVoy, et al
as 2:2014cv01732
Plaintiff:
Dale Frank Maisano
Defendant:
JR LaVoy, Corizon Health Incorporated, Charles L Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Dennison v. Charles Ryan, et al
as 12-15609
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE ALMOND DENNISON
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES L. RYAN, Director of Prison Operations, ANTONIO BARRIOS, Deputy Warden, STACI FAY, Assistant Deputy Warden and others
Dennison # 143931 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2011cv02295
Plaintiff:
Andre Almond Dennison
Defendant:
Charles L Ryan, Antonio Barrios, Staci Fay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
