Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Martinez-Cordova v. Social Security Commissioner
as 3:2021cv01204
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner, Office of Regional Chief Counsel, Region II, W. Stephen Muldrow and others
Plaintiff:
Mr. Edgar E Martinez-Cordova
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Crespo-Munoz v. Social Security Commissioner
as 3:2019cv01724
Plaintiff:
Arcenette Crespo-Munoz
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rivera Collazo v. Social Security Commissioner
as 3:2019cv01278
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Plaintiff:
Marisol Rivera Collazo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Casull v. Social Security Commissioner
as 3:2016cv01620
Plaintiff:
Annette Casull
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Maldonado v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
as 3:2014cv01390
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner, US Attorney General and US Attorney General for the District of Puerto Rico
Plaintiff:
Jesus Maldonado
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Ramos Rodriguez v. Social Security Commissioner
as 3:2011cv01323
Plaintiff:
Nelson Ramos Rodriguez
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
CARABALLO SANTIAGO
as 3:2010cv02179
Plaintiff:
DEOVINIA CARABALLO SANTIAGO
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL, MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, SOCIAL SECURITY COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Rosado-Feliciano v. Commissioner of
as 3:2009cv01820
Plaintiff:
Margarita Rosado-Feliciano
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gomez-Pabon
as 3:2009cv01700
Plaintiff:
Nelson Gomez-Pabon
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 427 Social Security Benefits
Hernandez-Guzman
as 3:2008cv02240
Plaintiff:
Luis Hernandez-Guzman
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
