Cases 1 - 10 of 46
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS et al v. ROKITA et al
as 1:2023cv01805
Plaintiff:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, INDIANA BROADCASTERS ASSOCIATION, INDIANA PROFESSIONAL CHAPTER OF THE SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS and others
Defendant:
TODD ROKITA, RYAN MEARS and KERRY FORESTAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Jane Sullivan, et al v. University of Washington, et al
as 23-35313
Plaintiff / Appellee:
JANE SULLIVAN and P. POES, 1-75; Individually and on behalf of others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, a Washington public corporation and ELIZA SAUNDERS, Director of Public Records and Open Public Meetings, University of Washington
Intervenor Defendant / Appellant:
PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, INC.
Amicus Curiae:
REPORTERS COMMITTEE FOR FREEDOM OF THE PRESS, CALIFORNIANS AWARE, FIRST AMENDMENT COALITION and others
Martinez et al v. The City of Fresno
as 1:2022cv00307
Plaintiff:
Desiree Martinez, Fresno Homeless Union, Faith in the Valley and others
Defendant:
The City of Fresno
Amicus Curiae:
First Amendment Coalition, California News Publishers Association, Californians Aware and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Don Blankenship v. Bradley Blakeman
as 20-1886
Defendant:
KEVIN MCLAUGHLIN and DOES 1 THROUGH 50
Defendant / Appellant:
BRADLEY BLAKEMAN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DON BLANKENSHIP
Amicus Curiae:
NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION, VOX MEDIA, LLC, THE MCCLATCHY COMPANY and others
Index Newspapers LLC et al v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2020cv01035
Defendant:
City of Portland, John Does 1-60, U.S. Marshals Service and others
Plaintiff:
Tuck Woodstock, Kat Mahoney, Sam Gehrke and others
Amicus Curiae:
Underscore.news, National Police Association, Gales Creek Journal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IN RE: JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
as 1:2020mc00016
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ROGER JASON STONE, JR.
In Re:
JUROR QUESTIONNAIRES IN UNITED STATES V. STONE
Petitioner:
MICHAEL CERNOVICH
Amicus Curiae:
TULLY CENTER FOR FREE SPEECH, GANNETT CO., INC., INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTARY ASSN. and others
Intervenor:
JURORS
McLean, et al v. Puerto Rico, et al
as 1:2019cv00648
Defendant:
Jennifer Lopez, Armando Christian Perez, Peter Gene Hernandez and others
In Re:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Vicki Fanning McLean, Estate of Louis Fanning, Sr. and Estate of James McLean
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin, et al v. Rollins
as 19-1629
Plaintiff / Appellee:
K. ERIC MARTIN and RENE PEREZ
Defendant:
WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Commissioner of the Boston Police Department and WILLIAM G. GROSS, in his Official Capacity as Police Commissioner for the City of Boston
Defendant / Appellant:
RACHAEL SPLAINE ROLLINS, in her Official Capacity as District Attorney for Suffolk County
Amicus Curiae:
SOCIETY OF PROFESSIONAL JOURNALISTS, NATIONAL PRESS PHOTOGRAPHERS ASSOCIATION, NEW YORK TIMES and others
Juan Machado Amadis v. DOS, et al
as 19-5088
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice and United States Department of State
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Juan Luciano Machado Amadis
Amicus Curiae:
Investigative Reporting Workshop, Reuters News & Media Inc., ProPublica and others
The Washington Post v. David McManus, Jr.
as 19-1132
Defendant / Appellant:
BRIAN E. FROSH, Maryland Attorney General, LINDA H. LAMONE, State Administrator, Maryland State Board of Elections, KELLEY A. HOWELLS, Board Member, Maryland State Board of Elections and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CARROLL COUNTY TIMES, LLC, d/b/a Carroll County Times, CAPITAL GAZETTE COMMUNICATIONS, INCORPORATED, d/b/a The Capital, GATEHOUSE MEDIA MARYLAND HOLDINGS, INC., d/b/a The Herald-Mail and others
Amicus Curiae:
MPA- THE ASSOCIATION OF MAGAZINE MEDIA, INSTITUTE FOR FREE SPEECH, CAMPAIGN LEGAL CENTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
