Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Isaac v. Atkins et al
as 1:2024cv00920
Plaintiff:
Edwin Isaac
Defendant:
Lior Danziger, Tal Payne, Marcel Gani and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00337
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Blaufarb v. Lando et al
as 1:2024cv04427
Defendant:
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., J.B. Lowe, Ronen Faier and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Blaufarb
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Hirani v. Lando et al
as 1:2024cv01948
Defendant:
Zvi Lando, Ronen Faier, Nadav Zafrir and others
Plaintiff:
Abdul Hirani
Cascallar v. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10847
Plaintiff:
Javier Alcides Cascallar
Defendant:
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., Zvi Lando and Ronen Faier
Shen v. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv09748
Plaintiff:
Daphne Shen
Defendant:
SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., Zvi Lando and Ronen Faier
Cheryl Sauer v. SolarEdge Technologies, Inc., et al
as 23-55636
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CHERYL SAUER, individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee:
SOLAREDGE TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and DOES, 1-10 Inclusive
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01743
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Arbella Protection Insurance Company v. ReVision Energy, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10508
Plaintiff:
Arbella Protection Insurance Company
Defendant:
ReVision Energy, Inc., SolarEdge Technologies, Hanwha Q Cells America, Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Reford v. SolarEdge Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv09423
Plaintiff:
Allan Reford
Defendant:
SolarEdge Technologies Inc., SolarEdge Technologies Limited, Zvi Lando and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
