Cases 1 - 10 of 120
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2019cv00303
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA, MIKE POMPEO and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Frederick Banks v. Felicia Langford
as 17-7380
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
FELICIA LANGFORD, Assistant US Attorney, JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General, ROBERT CESSAR, Assistant US Attorney and others
Frederick Banks v. Kelly Forbes
as 17-7207
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
KELLY FORBES, FMC Butner, U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, MARK HORNAK and others
Frederick Banks v. Soo Song, et al
as 17-2841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SOO SONG, SEAN LANGFORD, ROBERT WERNER and others
Banks v. Song et al
as 1:2017cv00363
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark J. Hornak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 5:2017cv00117
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Soo Song, Robert Cessar, Mark R. Hornak, J and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BANKS v. SONG et al
as 1:2017cv02590
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, ROBERT CESSAR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BANKS v. ROE et al
as 2:2017mc00672
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK BANKS
Defendant:
ADRIAN ROE, MARK R. HORNAK, ROBERT CESARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Song et al
as 3:2017cv01183
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Robert Cessar, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Banks v. Roe et al
as 3:2017cv00329
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Adrian Roe, Mark R Hornak, Soo Song and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
