Cases filed in the Fifth Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Parker v. Xcel Energy Services Inc et al
as 2:2024cv00078
Plaintiff: Donnie Parker Individually and on Behalf of all Others Similarly Situated doing business as Spring Creek Ranch
Defendant: Xcel Energy Services, Inc., Southwestern Public Service Company doing business as Xcel Energy, Osmose Utility Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
SW Public Svc v. FERC
as 23-60015
Petitioner: Southwestern Public Service Company
Respondent: Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Brandt Engineers Group, Ltd v. Xcel Energy, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv00036
Defendant: Southwestern Public Service Company and Xcel Energy, Inc.
Plaintiff: Brandt Engineers Group, Ltd. d/b/a Brandt Engineers and Brandt Engineers Group, Ltd doing business as Brandt Engineers
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Southwestern Public Service Company v. Bolttech Mannings, Inc.
as 2:2020cv00100
Defendant: Bolttech Mannings, Inc.
Plaintiff: Southwestern Public Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
NextEra Engy Captl Holdings, et al v. Ken Paxton, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-50160
Plaintiff / Appellant: NEXTERA ENERGY TRANSMISSION SOUTHWEST, L.L.C., LONE STAR TRANSMISSION, L.L.C., NEXTERA ENERGY TRANSMISSION, L.L.C. and others
Defendant / Appellee: COMMISSIONER SHELLY BOTKIN, Public Utility Commission of Texas, in her official capacity, CHAIRMAN DEANN T. WALKER, Public Utility Commission of Texas, in her official capacity and COMMISSIONER ARTHUR C. D'ANDREA, Public Utility Commission of Texas, in his official capacity
Amicus Curiae: LSP TRANSMISSION HOLDINGS II, L.L.C., TEXAS INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS, ENTERGY TEXAS, INCORPORATED and others
NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc. et al v. Paxton et al
as 1:2019cv00626
Defendant: Arthur C. D'Andrea, Shelly Botkin, Ken Paxton and others
Plaintiff: NextEra Energy Capital Holdings, Inc., Lone Star Transmission LLC, NextEra Energy Transmission Midwest, LLC and others
Petitioner: Entergy Services, LLC, Texas Industrial Energy Consumers, Entergy Texas, Inc. and others
Intervenor: Oncor Electric Delivery Company LLC
Intervenor Plaintiff: East Texas Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Amicus Curiae: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Southwestern Public Service Company v. Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
as 2:2017cv00043
Plaintiff: Southwestern Public Service Company
Defendant: Southwest Power Pool, Inc.
Intervenor_plaintiff: Golden Spread Electric Cooperative, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
State of Texas, et al v. EPA, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 16-60118
Petitioner: STATE OF TEXAS, TEXAS COMMISSION ON ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, PUBLIC UTILITY COMMISSION OF TEXAS and others
Respondent: UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY and GINA MCCARTHY, in her official capacity as Administrator of the United States Environmental Protection Agency
Exelon Wind 1, L.L.C., et al v. Donna Nelson, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-51228
Plaintiff - Appellee: EXELON WIND 1, L.L.C., formerly known as JD Wind 1, L.L.C., EXELON WIND 2, L.L.C., JD Wind 2, L.L.C., EXELON WIND 3, L.L.C., formerly known as JD Wind 3, L.L.C. and others
Defendant - Appellant: DONNA NELSON, in her official capacity as Chairman of the Public Utility Commission of Texas, KENNETH W. ANDERSON, JR., in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas and ROLANDO PABLOS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of the Public Utility Commission of Texas
Intervenor Defendant - Appellant: SOUTHWESTERN PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY and OCCIDENTAL PERMIAN, LIMITED
Allen,et al v. Xcel Energy Services, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00242
Plaintiff: Charlie Allen , Sharon Allen , William Tucker and others
Defendant: Xcel Energy, Inc. and Southwestern Public Service Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?