Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Spencer Brasure v. USDC-CASF
as 14-70941
:
In re: SPENCER RAWLINS BRASURE, Independent Caterers, Inc.
Petitioner:
SPENCER RAWLINS BRASURE, Independent Caterers, Inc.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
ALABASTER WHOLESALE NURSERY, ALTOS PALMS WHOLESALE NURSERY, AMBIDA WHOLESALE NURSERY and others
Spencer Brasure v. USDC-CASF
as 13-74049
:
In re: SPENCER RAWLINS BRASURE, Independent Caterers, Inc.
Petitioner:
SPENCER RAWLINS BRASURE, Independent Caterers, Inc.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO
Real Party In Interest:
ALABASTER WHOLESALE NURSERY, ALTOS PALMS WHOLESALE NURSERY, AMBIDA WHOLESALE NURSERY and others
Spencer Rawlins Brasure v. Kevin Chappelle
as 2:2013cv05392
Petitioner:
Spencer Rawlins Brasure
Respondent:
Kevin Chappelle
Brasure -v- Chappelle
as 3:2013mc80156
Plaintiff:
Spencer Rawlins Brasure
Defendant:
Kevin Chappelle
Brasure v. Chappell et al
as 3:2012cv03774
Plaintiff:
Spencer Rawlins Brasure
Defendant:
Kevin R. Chappell and State of Califoria
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Spencer Brasure v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 12-55743
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SPENCER RAWLINS BRASURE
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., Governor, ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Ex Governor, R. GEORGE, California Supreme Court Justice and others
Spencer Brasure v. Michael Martel
as 11-73841
Petitioner:
SPENCER RAWLINS BRASURE
Respondent:
MICHAEL MARTEL
Spencer Brasure v. Michael Martel
as 11-56572
Petitioner - Appellant:
SPENCER RAWLINS BRASURE
Respondent - Appellee:
MICHAEL MARTEL
Spencer Rawlins Brasure v. Michael Martel
as 2:2011cv05451
Petitioner:
Spencer Rawlins Brasure
Respondent:
Michael Martel
Spencer Brasure v. Robert Wong
as 10-55152
Petitioner - Appellant:
SPENCER RAWLINS BRASURE
Respondent - Appellee:
ROBERT K. WONG, Warden, San Quentin State Prison
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
