Cases 1 - 7 of 7
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. et al v. SAM et al
as 2:2016mc00136
Plaintiff:
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
Defendant:
CASSIN N. SAM, IQUINDA M. CERISIER, ASHLEY ANN HENRY and others
Movant:
JINGXIAN YE
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Type:
Other Statutes
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. v. ZHENG et al
as 2:2016cv00732
Plaintiff:
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
Defendant:
JIAN X. ZHENG and XIANG ZHENG
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. et al v. SHAO et al
as 2:2014cv00545
Plaintiff:
SPRINT SOLUTIONS, INC. and SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P.
Defendant:
LIANG JIN SHAO and LIBERTY LAUNDROMAT
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al v. CARANGI et al
as 2:2012cv06473
Plaintiff:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION and SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P.
Defendant:
NICHOLAS A. CARANGI and MAJD JABBARIN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
LAKE FOREST PARTNERS, L.P. et al v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. et al
as 2:2012cv00999
Plaintiff:
LAKE FOREST PARTNERS, L.P. and MARY ANASTASIA LAPIC
Defendant:
SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., QWEST COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, LLC, LEVEL 3 COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC et al v. SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. et al
as 2:2012cv00859
Defendant:
NEXTEL OPERATIONS, INC., SPRINT SPECTRUM L.P., SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P. and others
Counter Defendant:
COMCAST CORPORATION, COMCAST BUSINESS COMMUNICATIONS, LLC, COMCAST IP PHONE, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
COMCAST CABLE HOLDINGS, LLC, COMCAST MO GROUP, INC., COMCAST CABLE COMMUNICATIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 183
GAMMINO v. SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv07502
Plaintiff:
JOHN R. GAMMINO
Defendant:
SPRINT NEXTEL CORPORATION, SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY L.P., SPRINT SPECTRUM, L.P. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
