Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Homan v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 2:2024cv02041
Plaintiff:
Stacey Lee Homan
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Smith v. Madery et al
as 2:2023cv12703
Plaintiff:
Larry David Smith
Defendant:
Brian Madery, D. Brassfield, Jennifer Norder and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv01974
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Purisima v. Encore Community Services et al
as 1:2023cv07727
Plaintiff:
Anton C. Purisima
Defendant:
Encore Community Services, Stacey Lee, New York City and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Milch v. Segal
as 0:2023cv00838
Petitioner:
Stacey Lee Milch
Respondent:
Warden Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DeRose et al v. City of Raleigh et al
as 5:2022cv00413
Plaintiff:
Lanette B DeRose and Richard T DeRose
Defendant:
City of Raleigh, DoorDash, Inc., Beaver Creek Land Holdings, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
ADAMS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv12632
Plaintiff:
STACEY LEE ADAMS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ELLIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv09700
Plaintiff:
STACEY LEE ELLIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Leifheit v. Leifheit
as 1:2022cv01976
Defendant:
Catina Leifheit, Catina Jordan and Catina Bailey
Plaintiff:
Spencer Edward Leifheit, III and Stacey Lee Heinrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Leifheit et al v. Lujan
as 1:2022cv01978
Defendant:
Enrique V Lujan and Henry Lujan
Plaintiff:
Spencer Edward Leifheit, III and Stacey Lee Heinrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
