Cases 1 - 10 of 16
WILLIAMS et al v. HALL et al
as 1:2023cv01057
Plaintiff:
SHAUNA WILLIAMS, FLOR HERRERA-PICASSO, MINERVA FREEMAN and others
Defendant:
DESTIN HALL, WARREN DANIEL, RALPH E. HISE, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Siddhanth Sharma v. Alan Hirsch
as 23-2164
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIDDHANTH SHARMA
Defendant / Appellee:
ALAN HIRSCH, Chairman of NCBOE, in his official capacity, KAREN BRINSON BELL, in his official capacity, JEFF CARMON, in his official capacity and others
DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA et al v. HIRSCH et al
as 1:2023cv00878
Plaintiff:
DEMOCRACY NORTH CAROLINA, NORTH CAROLINA BLACK ALLIANCE and LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant:
ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, III, KEVIN LEWIS and others
Intervenor Defendant:
REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE, NORTH CAROLINA REPUBLICAN PARTY, VIRGINIA A. WASSERBERG and others
Petitioner:
PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
VOTO LATINO et al v. HIRSCH et al
as 1:2023cv00861
Plaintiff:
VOTO LATINO, THE WATAUGA COUNTY VOTING RIGHTS TASK FORCE, DOWN HOME NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant:
ALAN HIRSCH, JEFF CARMON, STACY EGGERS IV and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY et al v. NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS et al
as 1:2023cv00862
Plaintiff:
NORTH CAROLINA DEMOCRATIC PARTY and DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE
Defendant:
NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, KAREN BRINSON BELL, ALAN HIRSCH and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER, TIMOTHY K. MOORE, REPUBLICAN NATIONAL COMMITTEE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
NORTH CAROLINA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS v. HIRSCH et al
as 1:2023cv00837
Plaintiff:
North Carolina Alliance For Retired Americans
Defendant:
Alan Hirsch, Jeff Carmon, Stacy Eggers IV and others
Intervenor Defendant:
PHILIP E. BERGER and TIMOTHY K. MOORE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Siddhanth Sharma v. Damon Circosta
as 23-1535
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SIDDHANTH SHARMA
Defendant / Appellee:
DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, in his official capacity as a member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Juliette Grimmett v. Nancy Freeman
as 22-1844
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JULIETTE GRIMMETT, RALSTON LAPP GUINN MEDIA GROUP, JOSH STEIN and others
Defendant / Appellee:
NANCY LORRIN FREEMAN, in her official capacity as District Attorney for the 10th Prosecutorial District of the State of North Carolina
Defendant:
DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as Chair of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as Secretary of the North Carolina State Board of Elections, JEFF CARMON, III, In his official capacity as Member of the North Carolina State Board of Elections and others
Amicus Curiae:
DUKE FIRST AMENDMENT CLINIC
GRIMMETT et al v. CIRCOSTA et al
as 1:2022cv00568
Plaintiff:
JULIETTE GRIMMETT, RALSTON LAPP GUINN MEDIA GROUP, JOSH STEIN FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL CAMPAIGN and others
Defendant:
DAMON CIRCOSTA, STELLA ANDERSON, JEFF CARMON III and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
North Carolina Green Party et al v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 5:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
North Carolina Green Party, Tony Ndege, Matthew Hoh and others
Defendant:
North Carolina State Board of Elections, Chair Damon Circosta, Stella Anderson and others
Intervenor Defendant:
DSCC and North Carolina Democratic Party
Amicus Curiae:
National Republican Senatorial Committee
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
