Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Colson v. City of San Marcos
as 24-50283
Plaintiff:
Austin Ray Colson
Defendant:
City of San Marcos, Texas, Chief of Police Stan Standridge, Officer Stan Standridge and others
Colson v. City of San Marcos, Texas et al
as 1:2023cv00450
Plaintiff:
Austin Ray Colson
Defendant:
City of San Marcos, Texas, Chief of Police Stan Standridge, Officer Kyle Lobo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reece v. Taylor et al
as 1:2022cv00386
Plaintiff:
James Reece
Defendant:
Michael Taylor, Loy Locke, Kye Kennedy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sutterfield v. Hogue et al
as 1:2018cv00206
Defendant:
Robert Hanna, Brady Hogue and Stan Standridge
Plaintiff:
Casey Brent Sutterfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Larry Gordon v. Robert Naeugebauer, et al
as 15-10050
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LARRY RUSSELL GORDON
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT RANDOLPH NAEUGEBAUER, ABILENE POLICE DEPARTMENT, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS and others
In re: Larry Gordon
as 14-10979
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY RUSSELL GORDON
Respondent:
RANDY NEUGEBAUER, ABILENE POLICE DEPARTMENT, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS and others
In re: Larry Gordon
as 14-10934
Petitioner:
In re: LARRY RUSSELL GORDON
Respondent:
RANDY NEUGEBAUER, ABILENE POLICE DEPARTMENT, TAYLOR COUNTY, TEXAS and others
Gordon v. Neugebauer et al
as 1:2014cv00093
Defendant:
Randy Neugebauer, Abilene Police Department , TX - Taylor County and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Russell Gordon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cass et al v. City of Abilene et al
as 1:2013cv00177
Plaintiff:
Tammy Cass , Marcus Cass , Matthew Cass and others
Defendant:
City of Abilene, Stan Standridge and Chris Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. The City of Abilene et al
as 1:2013cv00062
Plaintiff:
Kyle Chandler Cox
Defendant:
The City of Abilene, The Abilene Police Department, J Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
