Cases 1 - 10 of 12
DINGLER et al v. HATTEN et al
as 1:2017cv02232
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DINGLER and ASHTON DINGLER
Defendant:
JAMES N. HATTEN, JUSTIN S. ANAND, AMY TOTTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DINGLER et al v. HATTEN et al
as 1:2017cv02200
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH DINGLER and ASHTON DINGLER
Defendant:
JAMES N. HATTEN, JUSTIN S. ANAND, AMY TOTTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Dingler et al v. Hatten et al
as 1:2017cv03632
Plaintiff:
Joseph Dingler and Ashton Dingler
Defendant:
James N. Hatten, Justin S. Anand, Amy Totenberg and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Rolle v. U.S. Court of Appeals Eleventh, et al
as 14-14336
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL LAMONT ROLLE
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH CIRCUIT, CHARLES R. WILSON, Circuit Judge, FRANK M. HULL, Circuit Judge and others
Gregory Kapordelis v. Ed Carnes, et al
as 12-10956
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY C KAPORDELIS
Defendant - Appellee:
ED CARNES, GERALD BARD TJOFLAT, J. L. EDMONDSON and others
Kapordelis v. Carnes et al
as 1:2011cv01769
Plaintiff:
Gregory C. Kapordelis
Defendant:
Edward T. Carnes, Gerald B. Tjoflat, J. L. Edmondson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Donald Jones v. William Pryor, et al
as 10-16779
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM H. PRYOR, ED CARNES, ALAN J. BAVERMAN and others
USA, Ex Rel et al v. USA et al
as 1:2010cv00321
Defendant:
Ryan Barry, Stanley F. Birch, Jr., Susan H. Black and others
Plaintiff:
Jorg Busse, Jennifer Franklin Prescott and USA, Ex Rel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Jones v. Pryor et al
as 3:2010cv02750
Plaintiff:
Donald G. Jones
Defendant:
William H. Pryor, Ed Carnes, Alan J. Baverman and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
JONES v. UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT et al
as 1:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
DONALD G. JONES
Defendant:
UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, WILLIAM K. SUTER, GAIL JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
