Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Robert Woods v. Haar, et al
as 22-55253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT STANLEY WOODS, AKA Saladin Rushdan
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR HAAR, DOCTOR BREEN, DOCTOR TAYLOR and others
Rushdan v. Eshelman
as 3:2021cv01000
Plaintiff:
Saladin Rushdan and Robert Stanley Woods
Defendant:
L. Eshelman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Wood et al v. North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv00065
Defendant:
North Mississippi Medical Center, Inc., John Does 1-10, Alliance Collection Service, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stanley Wood and Chastity Wood
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Robert Stanley Woods v. Haar et al
as 2:2019cv00695
Plaintiff:
Robert Stanley Woods and Saladin Rushdan
Defendant:
T. Macias, Taylor, Haar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woods v. Haar et al
as 3:2019cv00168
Plaintiff:
Saladin Rushdan, Robert Stanely Woods and Robert Stanley Woods
Defendant:
T. Macias, Dr. Taylor, Dr. Breen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Saladin Rushdan v. R. Gear, et al
as 18-16191
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALADIN RUSHDAN, AKA Robert Woods, AKA Robert Stanley Woods
Defendant - Appellee:
R. GEAR, D.M. SINGH, F. VASQUEZ and others
Williams v. Nugent et al
as 8:2018cv01125
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Richard Nugent, Richard Condray, Manuel Zurita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Saladin Rushdan v. R. Gear, et al
as 17-17035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALADIN RUSHDAN, AKA Robert Woods, AKA Robert Stanley Woods
Defendant - Appellee:
R. GEAR, D.M. SINGH, F. VASQUEZ and others
United States of America v. Arberry (Rose)
as 17-689
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
James Arberry, AKA Stanley Woods
Defendant - Appellant:
Floyd Rose
Saladin Rushdan v. D. Davey, et al
as 17-15033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SALADIN RUSHDAN, AKA Robert Stanley Woods
Defendant - Appellee:
D. DAVEY, Warden, CASAS, Prison Guard, ROQUE, Prison Guard and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
