Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Starbucks Corporation v. NLRB
as 24-1585
Petitioner:
Starbucks Corporation
Respondent:
National Labor Relations Board
Smith v. Starbucks Corporation
as 4:2024cv00055
Plaintiff:
Amber Smith
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Starbucks Corporation v. Service Employees International Union et al.
as 3:2023cv00068
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant:
Service Employees International Union doing business as Workers United doing business as Starbucks Workers United, Iowa City Starbucks Workers United, Workers United doing business as Starbucks Workers United and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Smith v. Starbucks Corporation
as 4:2022cv00402
Plaintiff:
Amber Smith
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Little Rock Outlets Realty Holding LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
as 4:2022cv00468
Plaintiff:
Little Rock Outlets Realty Holding LLC
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv00281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Roy Day v. State of Minnesota, et al
as 19-3086
Defendant / Appellee:
State of Minnesota, Target Corporation, Dadri-Anne Alecia Graham and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Roy A. Day
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv02301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
