Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Starbucks Corporation v. Does 1-10
as 2:2022cv01481
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation, a Washington corporation and Starbucks Corporation
Defendant:
Does 1-10, inclusive and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Communication Interface Technologies, LLC v. Starbucks Corporation
as 2:2022cv07614
Plaintiff:
Communication Interface Technologies, LLC
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Ameranth, Inc. v. Pizza Hut, Inc. et al
as 3:2011cv01810
Defendant:
Pizza Hut, Inc., QuikOrder, Inc., IPDEV Co. and others
Amicus Curiae:
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Plaintiff:
Ameranth, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 0271
Starbucks Corporation v. Howard Heller et al
as 8:2014cv01383
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation and Starbucks Corporation doing business as Starbucks Coffee Company
Defendant:
Howard Heller, Specialty Coffees International LLC, Cafe Nu International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Starbucks Corporation v. Hitman Glass et al
as 2:2016cv03937
Defendant:
Does, Hitman Glass and James Landgraf
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation
Starbucks Corporation v. NeoMedia Technologies Inc
as 2:2014cv00365
Plaintiff:
Starbucks Corporation
Defendant:
NeoMedia Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Freeman v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2013cv04397
Plaintiff:
Albert John Freeman
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Ameranth, Inc. v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2013cv01072
Plaintiff:
Ameranth, Inc.
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Evolution Fast Foods, LLC v. Evolution Fresh, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv02003
Plaintiff:
Evolution Fast Foods, LLC
Defendant:
Evolution Fresh, Inc. , Starbucks Corporation and Does 1-20, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
