Cases 1 - 10 of 32
Campuzano et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 3:2023cv02152
Plaintiff:
Ariana Beltran Campuzano and Zoe Lima
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation, Does 1 through 50 inclusive and Does 1 through 50
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lr Diversity - Labor
Connelly v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv00746
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Kerry Connelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Connelly v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 1:2021at00525
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and DOES 1 - 50, Inclusive
Plaintiff:
Kerry Connelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brekke et al v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 3:2021cv00751
Plaintiff:
Jordone Shane-Sanchez, Omar Galrland, Casey McKay and others
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mihaly Harisis v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2020cv05210
Plaintiff:
Mihaly Harisis
Defendant:
Does 1 through 10, inclusive and Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Anderson et al v. Starbucks Corporation
as 3:2020cv01178
Plaintiff:
Christina Denton, Katherine Butler, James Hancock and others
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marie Hernandez v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 2:2017cv03150
Defendant:
Does, Starbucks Corporation and Teavana Corporation
Plaintiff:
Marie Hernandez
Carrington v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv03074
Plaintiff:
Kileigh Carrington
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Carrington v. Starbucks Corporation et al
as 3:2014cv01763
Plaintiff:
Kileigh Carrington
Defendant:
Starbucks Corporation and Does 1-10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Mark Swoveland v. Starbucks Corporation, et al.
as 8:2014cv00629
Defendant:
Does and Starbucks Corporation
Plaintiff:
Mark Swoveland
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
