Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 972
Harmon v. State of Alaska
as 25-1839
Petitioner: JAMES D. HARMON
Respondent: STATE OF ALASKA
Lambert v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2025cv00049
Plaintiff: Newton Lambert
Defendant: State of Alaska and Richard Subodny
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Lambert v. State of Alaska et al
as 3:2025cv00050
Plaintiff: Newton Lambert
Defendant: State of Alaska and Richard Subodny
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00003
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
The Estate of Lewis Jordan, Jr. et al v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2025cv00044
Plaintiff: The Estate of Lewis Jordan, Jr. and Rachael Waterhouse
Defendant: State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Curney and Ouellette
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tejada v. State of Alaska
as 1:2025cv00071
Petitioner: Alex Tejada
Respondent: State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Soto v. State of New York et al
as 1:2025cv01543
Plaintiff: Luis Danny Soto
Defendant: State of New York, State of California, State of Florida and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dyer v. State of Alaska
as 3:2025cv00040
Petitioner: Kevin McLain Dyer
Respondent: State of Alaska
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00007
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Salad v. State of Alaska, Department of Corrections et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2025cv00029
Petitioner: Roble Ahmed Salad
Respondent: State of Alaska, Department of Corrections, Arlando Hernandez, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?