Cases 1 - 10 of 62
Alfonso Villalobos et al v. State of Nevada Department of Employment Training Rehabilitation
as 5:2022cv01664
Plaintiff:
Alfonso Villalobos, Victoria Villalobos, Elizabeth Villalobos and others
Defendant:
State of Nevada Department of Employment Training Rehabilitation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Federal Trade Commission v. Meta Platforms Inc., et al
as 5:2022cv04325
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Meta Platforms Inc.,, Within Unlimited, Inc., Mark Zuckerberg and others
Interested Party:
Apple Inc., Alphabet Inc., Nike, Inc. and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of New York, State of Alaska, State of California and others
Not Classified By Court:
ByteDance Inc., Valve Corporation, HTC America, Inc. and others
Petitioner:
Forte Nexus, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0053 Federal Trade Commission Act
State of Utah et al v. Google LLC et al
as 3:2021cv05227
Plaintiff:
State of Utah, State of New York, State of North Carolina and others
Defendant:
Google LLC, Google Ireland Limited, Google Commercial Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
United States of America et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 3:2021mc80065
Plaintiff:
Tennessee, New York, State of, State of Nevada and others
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation and Oncology Therapeutics Network Corporation
3Rd Party Defendant:
Office of the A California State Board of Pharmacy
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
as 3:2021md02981
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google Payment Corp., Google Commerce Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Jared Stark, Ashly Esquivel, Robert Wing and others
Counter Defendant:
Epic Games, Inc., Match Group, LLC and Humor Rainbow, Inc.
Counter Claimant:
Google LLC and Google Asia Pacific PTE. Limited
Not Classified By Court:
Activision Blizzard, Inc., Niantic, Inc., Big Fish Games and others
Amicus Curiae:
American Antitrust Institute and Economists Supporting Dr. Rysman as Proposed Amici
3Rd Party Defendant:
Riot Games, Inc.
Interested Party:
Valve Corporation, Nintendo of America Inc., Police and Fire Retirement System of the City of Detroit and others
Petitioner:
Amazon.com LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
State of California et al v. David Bernhardt, U.S. Secretary of the Interior et al
as 4:2021cv00440
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Wilbur Ross, U.S. Secretary of Commerce, National Marine Fisheries Service, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California et al v. Dhillon et al
as 3:2020cv07664
Plaintiff:
Minnesota Department of Human Rights, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Janet Dhillon and U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
State of California et al v. Council on Environmental Quality et al
as 3:2020cv06057
Plaintiff:
State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota, State of Maryland and others
Defendant:
Mary Neumayr and Council on Environmental Quality
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Immigrant Legal Resource Center et al v. Wolf et al
as 4:2020cv05883
Plaintiff:
OneAmerica, Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc., Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights and others
Defendant:
U.S. Citizenship & Immigration Services, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Amicus Curiae:
State of Hawaii, State of New York, State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California et al v. Wheeler et al
as 3:2020cv04869
Defendant:
andrew r. wheeler and united states environmental protection agency
Plaintiff:
state of north carolina, state of minnesota, state of maryland and others
Intervenor:
Montana, State of, Arkansas, State of, National Hydropower Association and others
Intervenor Defendant:
State of Texas, State of West Virginia, State of Montana and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
