Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 28
United States of America v. U.S. Oncology, Inc.
as 23-1334
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of California, ex rel. Omni Healthcare, State of Colorado, ex rel. Omni Healthcare and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Omni Healthcare Inc.
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. Oncology, Inc.
United States of America v. Pharmerica Corporation
as 23-909
Plaintiff: ABC, United States of America, The State of Alaska and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: ex rel. Kaveh Askari
Defendant / Appellee: PharMerica Corporation, Pharmacy Corporation of America, Oncomed Specialty Pharmacy, LTD., DBA Onco360 and others
Defendant: DEF, David Froessel, Jeff Kimmel and others
United States of America v. McKesson Corporation
as 23-726
Plaintiff: ABC, United States of America, ex rel, State of California, ex rel and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Adam Hart
Defendant / Appellee: McKesson Corporation, McKesson Specialty Distribution LLC, Collectively and McKesson Specialty Care Distrobution Corportaion, Collectively, DBA McKesson Specialty Health
Defendant: DEF and McKesson Specialty Care Distribution JV LLC, FKA McKesson Specialty Care Distribution Joint Venture LP
J.T. v. de Blasio
as 20-4128
Defendant: Warner Unified School District, Cobb County School District, Fulton County School District and others
Defendant / Appellee: Bill de Blasio, in his official capacity as Mayor of New York City, School Districts in the United States, New York City Department of Education and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: C.N., individually and on behalf of V.N. and all others similarly situated, J.J., indivudally and on behalf of Z.J. and all others similarly situated and K.M., individually and on behalf of M.M. and S.M., and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff: J.T., individually and on behalf of D.T. and all others similarly situated
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv05878
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400
Clervrain v. Cissna et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02197
Defendant: United States District Court for the District of California, United States Department Office of the Labor, United Nations (U.N.) and others
Plaintiff: Manetirony Clervrain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America ex re v. Abbvie Inc.
as 19-2947
Plaintiff / Appellant: State of North Carolina ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of Texas ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D., State of New York ex rel. John R. Borzilleri, M.D. and others
Defendant: Anthem, Inc., formerly Wellpoint, CVS Caremark, Eli Lilly & Company and others
Defendant / Appellee: Humana Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff: ABC
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1988
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1987
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald J. Trump, President of the United States, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, Secretary of Homeland Security, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services and others
State of New York v. Donald Trump
as 18-1525
Plaintiff - Appellee: State of New York, State of Massachusetts, State of Washington and others
Defendant - Appellant: Donald J. Trump, in his official capacity as President of the United States, United States Department of Homeland Security, Kirstjen M. Nielsen, in her official capacity and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?