Cases 1 - 6 of 6
Research Foundation of State University of New York et al v. Sandoz Inc.
as 1:2011cv00162
Plaintiff:
Research Foundation of State University of New York , New York University , Galderma Laboratories Inc. and others
Defendant:
Sandoz Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Sandoz Inc.
Counter_defendant:
Galderma Laboratories Inc. , Galderma Laboratories LP , New York University and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Zhou v. State University of New York Institute of Technology et al
as 4:2009mc00323
Plaintiff:
Xu-Shen Zhou
Defendant:
State University of New York Institute of Technology, Lisa Bernardino, Stephen Havlovic and others
Research Foundation of State University of New York et al v. Impax Laboratories Inc.
as 1:2009cv00703
Plaintiff:
Research Foundation of State University of New York, New York University, Galderma Laboratories Inc. and others
Defendant:
Impax Laboratories Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Research Foundation of State University of New York et al v. Lupin Limited et al
as 1:2009cv00483
Plaintiff:
Research Foundation of State University of New York, New York University, Galderma Laboratories Inc. and others
Defendant:
Lupin Limited and Lupin Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Research Foundation of State University of New York et al v. Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
as 1:2009cv00184
Plaintiff:
Research Foundation of State University of New York, New York University, Galderma Laboratories Inc. and others
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MCCRACKEN v. BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC et al
as 2:2008cv02934
Plaintiff:
TED A. MCCRACKEN
Defendant:
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC, JEFFERSON SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, LLC, OAK RIDGE ASSOCIATED UNIVERSITIES INCORPORATED and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
