Cases 1 - 5 of 5
People of the State of Illinois, ex. rel Thomas Briddick v. Zhu et al
as 4:2024cv04045
Plaintiff:
People of the State of Illinois, ex rel Thomas P Briddick
Defendant:
Meilan Zhu and Qin Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
USA v. 7599358.09 plus accrued, et al
as 13-3777
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
7599358.09 PLUS ACCRUED INTEREST AND DIVIDENTS CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NUMBER RF24073H5 IN THE NAME AND/OR BENEFIT OF LEADING EDGE GROUP HOLDINGS AT UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES LOCATED AT 333 EARL OV, 6932966.44 PLUS ACCRUED INTEREST AND DIVIDENDS CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NUMBER RF54379H5 IN THE NAME AND/OR BENEFIT OF LEADING EDGE GROUP HOLDINGS AT UBS FINANCIAL SERVICES LOCATED AT 333 EARLE and 906471.21 CONTAINED IN ACCOUNT NUMBER 4208040808 IN THE NAME OF LEADING EDGE GROUP HOLDINGS AT BANK OF AMERICA LOCATED AT 5701 HORATIO STREET UTICA NEW YORK 13502
Defendant - Appellee:
NEW EXCEL INTERIORS
Claimant - Appellant:
DIRECTOR OF INSURANCE FOR THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, acting solely in his role as Liquidator of Administrative Employers Group and Employers Consortium Inc
USA et al v. Lopez et al
as 8:2013cv01377
Plaintiff:
USA , State of Florida, State of Georgia and others
Defendant:
Wellcare Health Plans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
United States of America et al v. Angiodynamics, Inc (TV3)
as 3:2011cv00556
Intervenor_plaintiff:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
State of California , State of Colorado , State of Connecticut and others
Defendant:
Angiodynamics, Inc
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
US v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 10-2154
Plaintiff - Appellant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Petitioner - Appellee:
STATE OF OREGON and STATE OF WISCONSIN
Petitioner:
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE OF ARIZONA, STATE OF ARKANSAS and others
Defendant:
TERENCE PATRICK MCLAUGHLIN, GEORGE CHEMALI and CLP, INCORPORATED
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
