Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Hazzard v. The State of Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2018cv50116
Plaintiff:
Melicor Hazzard
Defendant:
The State of Illinois Department of Corrections, Robert D. De la Rosa and John Varga
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Combs v. State Of Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2013cv00181
Plaintiff:
Chad Combs
Defendant:
State Of Illinois Department of Corrections, S A Godinez, Donald Gaetz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinez v. State Of Illinois Department of Corrections
as 3:2012cv01026
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Martinez
Defendant:
State Of Illinois Department of Corrections, Lisa Madigan and S.A. Godinez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Walker v. Rowland et al
as 3:2012cv00329
Petitioner:
Danell Walker
Respondent:
Trevor M. Rowland and State Of Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Rowland et al
as 1:2012cv01332
Plaintiff:
Danell Walker
Defendant:
Trevor M. Rowland and State of Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cooper v. State of Illinois Department of Corrections
as 3:2010cv03215
Plaintiff:
Joseph Cooper
Defendant:
State of Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Levy v. Gates et al
as 3:2009cv00360
Plaintiff:
Enrico Levy
Defendant:
Warden Gates, Mrs Schoer and State Of Illinois Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orr v. State Of Illinois Department of Corrections
as 3:2008cv00604
Defendant:
State Of Illinois Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
John Lee Orr
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Levy v. State Of Illinois Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2008cv00306
Plaintiff:
Enrico Levy
Defendant:
State Of Illinois Department of Corrections, Warden Barkley, Lee Ryker and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
