Cases 1 - 10 of 10
EQUALITY FLORIDA et al v. FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 4:2022cv00134
Plaintiff:
EQUALITY FLORIDA, FAMILY EQUALITY, M A and others
Defendant:
RONALD D DESANTIS, FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, THOMAS R GRADY and others
Amicus Curiae:
CHRISTIAN ACTION NETWORK, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NEW JERSEY, STATE OF NEW JERSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Khullar v. Rosario et al
as 0:2021cv62001
Plaintiff:
Divya Khullar
Defendant:
Emmanuel Rosario, Adriana Rosario, STATE OF OREGON ex rel. ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General for the State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Khullar v. Rosario et al
as 0:2021cv62003
Plaintiff:
Divya Khullar
Defendant:
Emmanuel Rosario, Adriana Rosario, STATE OF OREGON ex rel. ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General for the State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Khullar v. Rosario et al
as 0:2021cv62007
Plaintiff:
Divya Khullar
Defendant:
Emmanuel Rosario, Adriana Rosario, STATE OF OREGON ex rel. ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General for the State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Khullar v. Rosario et al
as 0:2021cv62006
Plaintiff:
Divya Khullar
Defendant:
Emmanuel Rosario, Adriana Rosario, STATE OF OREGON ex rel. ELLEN F. ROSENBLUM, Attorney General for the State of Oregon and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Yashica Robinson, et al v. Attorney General, State of Ala, et al
as 20-11401
Defendant / Appellant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA and SCOTT HARRIS
Plaintiff / Appellee:
YASHICA ROBINSON, ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER, WEST ALABAMA WOMEN'S CENTER and others
Not Classified By Court:
AMERICAN CENTER FOR LAW AND JUSTICE, SERVICE, SISTERSONG WOMEN OF COLOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE COLLECTIVE and others
Amicus Curiae:
STATE OF DELAWARE, STATE OF VERMONT, STATE OF KENTUCKY and others
Federal Trade Commission et al v. Help the Vets, Inc. et al
as 6:2018cv01153
Plaintiff:
State of Minnesota, State of Maryland, State Of Ohio and others
Defendant:
Help the Vets, Inc. and Neil G. Paulson, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Dept. of HHS, et. al.,, et al
as 11-11067
Plaintiff / Appellant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, BY AND THROUGH PAM BONDI ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General, STATE OF TEXAS, by and through Greg Abbott Attorney General and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MARY BROWN, An individual
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court:
JAMES F. BLUMSTEIN, THE INDEPENDENCE INSTITUTE, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Plaintiff:
HR POLICY ASSOCIATION
State of Florida, et al v. U.S. Department of HHS, et al
as 11-11021
Plaintiff / Appellee:
STATE OF FLORIDA, by and through Pam Bondi Attorney General, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, by and through Alan Wilson Attorney General, STATE OF NEBRASKA, by and through Jon Bruning Attorney General and others
Defendant / Appellant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, in her official capacity as the Secretary of the United States Department of Health and Human Services, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY and others
Amicus Curiae:
AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES, THE NATIONAL INDIAN HEALTH BOARD, STATE LEGISLATORS and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE, HR POLICY ASSOCIATION, PHILIP E. BERGER and others
Brown v. State of Oregon et al
as 8:2009cv02228
Plaintiff:
Michael T. Brown
Defendant:
Alta J. Brady, Michael T. Dugan, Sarah D. Foreman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
